Menu
Log in

News

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • Monday, March 23, 2026 9:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Article based on presentation by Kevin Kilcoyne, Director of Staffing Insurance, Barrow Group/Hilb Group

    Download the PDF version

    In high-risk operations like warehouses and construction sites, workers’ compensation performance isn’t something you “feel out.” You manage it the same way you manage production: with numbers you trust. Tracking a tight set of workers’ compensation KPIs gives you a common scoreboard across sites, shifts, job types, and supervisors—so you can benchmark injury performance, spot outliers fast, and stop guessing. The whole point is simple: measure what’s happening, compare it to what “good” looks like, and intervene before the next claim writes your story for you.

    Tracking KPIs in Workers’ Compensation

    Start with frequency and severity—they tell you how often injuries happen and how bad they are when they do. An Incident Frequency Rate (IFR) tracks recordable injuries relative to hours worked, making comparisons fair even when one site runs double the overtime. Pair that with a Severity Rate (average claims as a function of cost), and you’ll quickly see whether your problem is “too many small incidents” or “a few incidents that blow up.” That distinction matters because the fixes are different: housekeeping/training/guarding issues tend to drive frequency, while serious events often trace back to exposure control failures, task design, or poor hazard recognition under time pressure. 

    Next, track operational impact: Lost-Time Injuries (LTI) and DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred). These metrics pull you out of “paper-safety” and into reality—what injuries are actually removing capacity and disrupting schedules. If your DART is climbing while IFR stays flat, that’s a red flag that injuries are becoming more disruptive (or your return-to-work process is weak). That’s where benchmarking becomes powerful: you can compare departments doing the same work and ask the only question that matters—what’s different here, and why?

    Then connect safety to dollars without apology. Claim Costs (direct and indirect—medical, indemnity, admin fees) let you rank injury types by total financial impact, not just count. Add Experience Modification Rate (EMR) because it’s the insurance-world translation of your loss performance—and it directly influences premium and competitiveness. If leadership responds faster to a cost graph than a safety poster (spoiler: they do), these KPIs give you the language to win resources for prevention, training, engineered controls, and staffing levels that actually match the risk. 

    Finally, don’t leave money on the table: measure Return-to-Work (RTW) Time / Indemnity Rate—how quickly injured employees get back to full duty and how much wage replacement is accumulating. RTW performance is where strong risk managers quietly crush costs: faster, safer RTW reduces indemnity spend, keeps experienced workers connected to the job, and lowers the chance a claim turns into a long-term disability case. When you benchmark IFR, severity, LTI/DART, claim costs, EMR, and RTW together, you get a clean, defensible story: what’s driving injuries, what it’s costing you, what’s improving, and what’s not. And that’s how KPI tracking turns into fewer injuries and lower workers’ compensation costs—because the numbers force the right conversations, with nowhere for wishful thinking to hide. 

  • Monday, January 19, 2026 1:50 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Survey of U.S. privately-held staffing companies for their annual outlook. Now in its 29th year, this survey offers a more main‑street‑focused perspective on the industry’s expected growth.

    Read the 2026 Staffing Survey
  • Monday, January 19, 2026 11:30 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Previewing expectations of public staffing companies Q425 results, from the perspective of an investor.

    Read the report
  • Thursday, December 18, 2025 1:57 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Download the Report 

    Hot off the press is the BMO Employment Services Industry 2026 Outlook, written by Jeffrey Silber, senior analyst with BMO Capital Markets Corp. 

  • Wednesday, December 03, 2025 8:24 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Original source: MCO group
    Original post date: Dec 3, 2025

    Atlanta and surrounding metro counties concluded their December 2, 2025, runoff elections with incumbents mostly holding or reclaiming seats—Rusty Paul remained mayor of Sandy Springs—while notable upsets occurred in Roswell and South Fulton. Council and education board districts in Fulton also wrapped up closely watched contests. Other county-level runoffs await final certification.

    Election Results

    Georgia State House District 106 Special Election

    • Muhammad Akbar Ali defeated Marqus A. Cole in the special runoff for District 106 with 947 votes (54%) to Cole’s 794 votes (46%).

    Atlanta City Council

    • District 7: Thomas Worthy defeated Thad Flowers for the District 7 council seat
    • District 11: Wayne Martin defeated Nate Jester for the District 11 council seat

    Atlanta School Board

    • District 2: Tony Mitchell defeated Marlissa Crawford for the APS District 3 seat
    • District 6: Patreece Hutcherson defeated Tolton Pace for the APS District 6 seat
    • District 8: Kaycee Brock prevailed over Royce Mann for the APS At-Large District 8 seat

    Mayoral Races

    • Roswell: Mary Robichaux defeated incumbent Kurt Wilson to become the new mayor
    • Sandy Springs: Incumbent Rusty Paul defeated challenger Dontaye Carter to remain the mayor of Sandy Springs for a 4th term
    • South Fulton: City Council member Carmalitha L. Gumbs defeated former Council member Mark Baker

    More Election Results


  • Wednesday, September 10, 2025 9:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • Tuesday, April 08, 2025 12:10 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Be ready for whatever the future brings. Check out ASA's top staffing trends for 2025.

    Download the PDF
  • Tuesday, March 25, 2025 5:12 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)


  • Sunday, January 19, 2025 7:16 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)


  • Monday, December 23, 2024 3:29 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)


<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 


Contact

Phone: (404) 549-4525

Email: info@georgiastaffing.org

Georgia Staffing Association
5905 Atlanta Highway
Suite 101 PMB 5053 

Alpharetta, GA 30004

Connect on Social

Georgia Staffing Association is a 501(c)6 non-profit organization

(C) 2024 Georgia Staffing Association

Powered by Wild Apricot   |   Built by Merge Creative Inc

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software